Do you want to trade your Sony A7r IV for a Gfx 50s?

Fujifilm GFX 50S II Sony Alpha A7R IV

When contemplating whether or not to get the GFX 100, I debated whether or not to purchase the r4. As a complement to my prime and zoom lenses, I use the alphasevenarefour as a 50r. However, according to my observations, Sony always gives a few amazing shots out of the box, whilst Fuji is more colorful out of the box. I’m not trying to start a debate over which of them is the greatest; I’m simply trying to point out that time is of the essence in getting them all the same… I had two Canon cameras that worked quite well with OOC raw images, and at one point I had a Sigma camera mounted high up in the chapel of the church that shot a photo every minute for two hours straight. However, although the A7R IV is a highly powerful camera in many ways, the GFX 50S is not, particularly in terms of AF speed and overall performance.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Sony Alpha A7R IV

Specifications of the product

Fujifilm GFX 50S II

Also, please keep in mind that several of the websites on this list have evolved their review methodologies as well as their reporting style over time. It is worth noting that both the GFX 50S II and the A7R IV are newer models that are now available in the company’s product line-up. Both cameras are equipped with a PC Sync terminal, which allows them to be used to operate professional strobe lights, which is very useful for studio photographers. Taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Sony A7R IV is noticeably smaller than the Fujifilm GFX 50S II, which is a significant improvement over the previous model.

In comparison to the GFX100S, it is not as responsive as on-sensor phase detection. Phase detection technology, on the other hand, is more intelligent and can locate focus without the flutter that contrast detection technology needs. The hardware connections are completed with a mini HDMI connector, as well as a 3.5mm headphone and microphone jack. Bluetooth and Wi-Fi radios onboard make it possible to connect to a smartphone or tablet without the need of a cord. When doing these duties, the Fujifilm Cam Remote app is a must-have (and completely free) application; it allows for file transfer and wireless controls, the latter of which includes a live view from the lens.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Sony Alpha A7R IV

The camera is so good that it puts high-end 35mm full-frame cameras like the Sony Alpha 1, Canon EOS R5, and Nikon Z7 II in danger of being outclassed. Is the GFX 100S a true demonstration that medium-format is “More than full-frame,” and is it indeed a superior camera than the GFX 100 in every way? Check it out for yourself by reading our in-depth review, which includes a large gallery of full-size example photographs and videos. Despite having a smaller sensor, the A7R IV has a greater resolution of 60.2 megapixels, compared to the GFX 50S II’s 51.1 MP. This is despite the A7R IV having a smaller sensor.

Sony Alpha A7R IV vs Fujifilm GFX 50S II

For your convenience, we’ve given some Fujifilm RAW examples for you to see and download (thumbnail images shown below are not 100 percent representative). The Fujifilm GFX 50S II includes three distinct JPEG file quality settings, with SuperFine being the highest quality level, as well as the ability to shoot in RAW. It also supports RAW files. Here are several 100 percent crops that demonstrate the difference in quality between the different settings, with the file size shown in parentheses. When using ISO 50 to ISO 3200, this camera gives photographs that are free of noise, with minor noise developing at ISO 6400. The quicker ISO and sensitivity levels are still workable, however we recommend avoiding ISO and higher sensitivity settings if at all feasible.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Sony Alpha A7R IV

In Zone mode, you may choose from a 425-point AF area a 3×3, 5×5, or 7×7 zone out of the 3×3, 5×5, or 7×7 zone. During AF-C focus, the camera continuously monitors the target, putting it in the center of the focus zone as a result of this tracking. Indeed – and it was just this kind of evaluation that piqued my interest in the a7Riv, particularly as someone who has previously praised the earlier incarnations of the camera. There is no longer any disagreement on the MF Look, which is strictly prohibited on DPR, nor over the fact that many of us MF photographers believe there is a big difference between Fuji/Hassy 50 MP MF IQ and high-resolution FF. It is just an opinion based on a large amount of shooting, which in turn influences future camera purchase choices, as well as system decisions and leanings, among other things.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II Sony Alpha A7R IV

Fujifilm Gfx 50s II vs Sony A7r IV Comparison of Specifications

Sony Alpha A7R IV

As a result, if f/8 is required for depth of field on 44×33 mm, 24×36 mm will produce the Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Sony Alpha A7R IV same depth of field at f/6.2. However, the 44×33 mm sensor has a surface area that is just 1.68 times that of the 24×36 mm sensor. Cameras with longer battery life are able to capture more images before their batteries run out of power. As a starting point for the comparison, the following is a high-level summary of the major specifications of the two cameras. Slow-motion is an artistic video effect that gives the impression that time is moving more slowly. It is accomplished by recording a video at a frame rate that is greater than the typical playback rate of 24 or 30 frames per second.

Excerpt for your consideration

The higher resolution of the Sony A7R IV allows for more freedom in cropping shots and the option of printing bigger images. The maximum print size of the A7R IV for high quality output is 47.5 x 31.7 inches (120.7 x 80.5 cm) for very good quality output and 47.5 x 31.7 inches (120.7 x 80.5 cm) for good quality output. Typical dimensions are 38 x 25.3 inches (96.6 x 64.4 cm), and for exceptional quality, 31.7 x 21.1 inches (80.5 x 53.6 cm) is recommended. To give you an idea of what the Fujifilm GFX 50S II is capable of, the following dimensions are provided: 41.3 x 31 inches (104.9 x 78.6 cm) for good quality, 33 x 24.8 inches (83.9 x 62.9 cm) for very good quality, 27.5 x 20.6 inches (69.99 x 52.4 cm) for excellent quality, and 27.5 x 20.6 inches (69.9 52.4 cm) for excellent quality prints. The price of any camera will, of course, have a significant impact on the selection. The list of launch pricing provides an indicator of the market sector that the camera maker has been aiming its products towards. The A7R IV was introduced at a somewhat cheaper price than the GFX 50S II, making it more appealing to photographers working on a limited budget.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II Sony Alpha A7R IV

Leave a Reply